Developing Film with Caffenol

Caffenol Is a Great Developer!

For the past couple of years, I’ve been using Caffenol (film developer made with instant coffee) almost exclusively, for my black and white film developing. I have chosen some basic Caffenol recipes from Caffenol.org and through a lot of testing, I have adjusted those recipes to suit my own personal film developing preferences. By understanding how each of the ingredients contributes to the overall film developing effect, I have managed to refine the process and achieve excellent results.

Kodak Tri-X 400, home developed with Caffenol. Widelux F7.

Mixing a batch of Caffenol developer isn’t simply about combining the ingredients; success is dependent on how those ingredients are mixed, as well as developing time, temperatures, and agitation.

Caffenol ingredients. Washing soda, instant coffee and ascorbic acid.

The key to mixing a reliable batch of Caffenol is the same as any scientific exercise; I try to control as many variables as possible. Purity of ingredients, precise timing and temperature. By following these principles, results will be consistent and repeatable.

As a photographer who loves to shoot dance, events and documentary photography, I like to use film in the ISO 400 range, such as Kodak Tri-X 400. It’s a good, versatile film that can easily be pushed a few stops when necessary, like with low light, or mixed lighting situations. When properly exposed and developed, Kodak Tri-X 400 exhibits very good dynamic range, and is useful for a wide range of photographic styles.

Different developers have different effects, depending on their chemistry. The most popular developers, like Kodak HC-110, give Kodak Tri-X 400 decent sharpness and contrast, with good mid tones, depending on the light. Adox Rodinal, also a very popular developer, provides good contrast, but pronounced film grain, and somewhat poor acuity/sharpness. Over the years, Kodak’s HC-110 was my go-to developer, and Adox Rodinal was what we used back in the classroom in my school days.

A couple of years ago, I decided to try Caffenol developer for the first time. To be honest, I wasn’t expecting very much, as many of the examples I’d seen online weren’t exactly stellar, I was seeing under developed, washy, dull or flat looking images. It seemed to me (and probably to many other people) that Caffenol was something you could use to develop film if you were out of other options, and that the mainstream developers were much better. I soon learned that this was not true at all. Caffenol is not only an excellent developer, I believe it is (in my opinion) better than any other black and white developer, as long as it is mixed and used properly.

One of the variables—an important one—is your choice of instant coffee. There are many brands of instant coffee available. You need a brand that has a decent amount of caffeic acid. Caffeic acid is the active ingredient in Caffenol developer. Caffeic acid is a plant-based phenol. Phenols are the active ingredient in most film developers, however, commercial developers use synthetic phenols such as hydroquinone, mainly because they have good storage life, and remain active much longer than the natural, plant-based ones. Most commercial developers contain ingredients that are toxic to the environment, whereas Caffenol ingredients are completely environmentally friendly, and can be dumped down the drain. This is yet another good reason to use Caffenol as your film developer.

So, as I mentioned earlier, your choice of instant coffee is important. I’ve tried several brands, and the most effective kind I’ve tried is Taster’s Choice instant coffee. Just the basic, original Taster’s Choice brand. You may find other brands out there that are effective as well. Just avoid the decaffeinated brands, as they will not work. An interesting observation; the most bitter tasting instant coffee seems to work best. I can only speculate the reason for this—perhaps because the bitter coffee has more caffeic acid in it.

Recently I was asked to shoot a ballet class in a large university dance studio. I decided to shoot the dancers on Kodak Tri-X 400 black and white film, which I would subsequently process with Caffenol. The studio was large, with high ceilings and nice big windows, but the light was quite low, and so I knew I needed to push my film to ISO 1600 in order to bring up my shutter speeds to capture the action.

SFU Woodwards Dance. Hasselblad 205 FCC. Kodak Tri-X 400 pushed to 1600. Developed in Caffenol.

Interestingly, through searching the internet, I could not find examples of, or recipes for Caffenol specifically for push processing film. In fact, all I could find was discussions within photography forums on the topic of pushing film with Caffenol, wherein the general consensus was that you cannot use Caffenol to push process film, due to the limited time in which Caffenol remains active. However, I was not convinced. I knew there had to be some way to make Caffenol more effective for push processing. With some testing and calculations, I was able to produce a recipe and method that works, and is indeed very effective.

SFU Woodwards ballet class. Widelux F7. Ilford HP5 400, pushed to 1600. Developed in Caffenol.

The biggest problem people were facing when experimenting in push processing with Caffenol was the short lifespan of the developer. Oxidization begins immediately once the ingredients are mixed. A fresh batch of Caffenol remains viable for roughly 20-30 minutes, and even less when it reacts with the film. For conventional developers, push processing film 2 stops generally requires approximately 2.5x developing time. It works well, because the active ingredients in the developer remain adequately potent for the extra developing time required for push processing. This is one of the advantages of synthetic phenols over natural, plant based phenols.

So this was my dilemma; How do I extend or sustain the lifespan of my Caffenol developer? Well, I figured it out. I increased the volume of ascorbic acid, and also the volume of the sodium carbonate. The added ascorbic acid would prevent the film from fogging—a less desirable effect of film sitting in Caffenol developer over a long period of time—and additional sodium carbonate would slightly extend the potency of the developer. The other major important change was the frequency of agitations. I needed to agitate the film less frequently.

The normal agitation routine for developing film is to agitate continuously for the first minute, and then about 10 seconds every minute, for the duration of the developing time. I don’t want to go into too much detail here on what exactly is happening chemically during the process of agitation because it would be a very long article, and so I will write a brief explanation; The reason we agitate film is to refresh the chemistry that is reacting with the emulsion layer of the film. When the developer ingredients react with the film, a reaction layer/barrier is formed on the surface of the film. Agitation washes off that reaction layer and enables the process to continue with a fresh layer of developer. More agitation will cause a stronger, more rapid reaction. It is for this reason that I theorized that less agitation would sustain the potency of the Caffenol developer for a longer period. I change the agitation routine from 10 seconds every minute, to 10 seconds every 4 minutes. It worked! The Caffenol developer lasted just long enough to successfully develop film that was pushed two stops! The total developing time was 28 minutes.

SFU Woodwards ballet class. Canon EOS 1nRS. Kodak Tri-X 400 Pushed to 1600. Developed in Caffenol.

Here is the Caffenol recipe, and the method I used with my Kodak Tri-X 400 ISO film, pushed to 1600. This is to make 1 litre of developer:

Ingredients:

40g Tasters Choice instant coffee

40g sodium carbonate

20g ascorbic acid

Equipment:

Digital scale

Digital thermometer

Beakers

Kettle

Use an accurate digital scale to measure the volume of each of the ingredients. Your scale must be sensitive enough to measure volumes in grams. Measure your ingredients into separate beakers, or containers. Important: Do not mix the dry ingredients together!

Empty the instant coffee into 1000ml (or larger) beaker. Add a small amount of boiling water. ( I use about 100ml or so). Stir the coffee until fully dissolved. You can stir the solution with a stirring rod, a spoon, or you can swirl it in the beaker. Just be aware it is boiling hot.

Add some cold water (I add enough cold water to bring the solution up to about half) and then add the sodium carbonate (wash soda). Stir until all of the sodium carbonate is dissolved (approximately 3 minutes). Add the remaining cold water to bring the total volume up to 1000ml, before adding the ascorbic acid.

Check the temperature of the solution. At this point, it should be at the developing temperature of 20 °C. If the solution is hotter than 20 °C, you can add an ice cube until it cools to 20 °C. Be careful not to add too much ice. You don’t want to exceed the solution volume of 1000ml.

Add the ascorbic acid, and stir until fully dissolved. There will be a slight thermogenic reaction when adding the ascorbic acid, and there may be a bit of foaming. This is normal. The fully mixed Caffenol solution is now ready for developing. [Note: The oxidization process of the caffenol begins as soon as you’ve finished mixing your ingredients. You must have your developing tank prepared for developing, as the Caffenol will only be viable for approximately 25-30 minutes after mixing.]

Developing:

[Note: This developing formula/method is intended specifically for developing 400 ISO film that has been pushed to 1600. I have tested this formula with Kodak Tri-X 400 and Ilford HP5 Plus 400 (both pushed to 1600). I have not tested this formula on other films yet. I will be testing other films and recording the results in the near future.]

Set your developing timer for 28 minutes.

Check your Caffenol temperature. It should be 20 °C.

Pour your Caffenol developer into your developing canister. (I use a Paterson multi-reel developing tank which will hold 3 rolls of 35mm film, or 2 rolls of 120/220 film. For this canister, I use the entire 1000ml volume of Caffenol solution. If you have a smaller canister, you can use 500ml of the Caffenol solution, or enough to fill the canister but still allow for agitation.)

Start your developing timer.

Continuous agitation for the first minute, then agitate for 10 seconds every 4 minutes for the rest of the development time.

When the developing is complete, pour out the Caffenol and add your stop bath solution. Alternatively, if you’d rather not use stop bath, you could rinse your film with water instead, which will also stop the development process.

Agitate stop bath solution constantly for 1 minute.

Pour your stop bath solution back into a container (it can be reused several times).

Pour your fixer solution into the developing canister. Continuous agitation for the first minute, then agitate for 10 seconds every minute, for a total of 5 minutes. I use Ilford Rapid Fixer for my fixing solution. When fixing is finished, pour it into a container (it can be reused several times).

Rinse your film for several minutes (I rinse for about 3 minutes) with running water.

Use a wetting agent to prevent water spots on your film. I use Ilford Ilfotol wetting agent for 1 minute after rinsing the film. Hang your film to dry for at least 8 hours before handling.

Notes:

-Caffenol is intended as one-shot developer, and should not be reused. When finished developing, it is safe to discard the Caffenol down the sink.

-Normal caffenol developing time is 11:00 for Kodak Tri-X 400 (pushed 2 stops) x 2.5 = 27.5 minutes. I rounded the development time to 28 minutes.

-I added an additional 5g of sodium carbonate. (The standard is 35g.) I decreased agitation from 10 seconds every minute to 10 seconds every 4 minutes.


Be sure to check out Caffenol.org. It is a vast wealth of info on everything Caffenol related.

Classic Chevy with Hula Girl

In my previous post, I did a review on the amazing qualities of Bergger Pancro 400 film.

There was another image from that last roll which I wanted to include. I’ll post it here.

Near my Sweetie’s old art studio there is a lot with some cars that are in various stages of repair and restoration. There’s one car in particular that I just love. It’s an old Chevy that’s slowly being restored. It’s a beautiful big old car, with so much character. The most charming thing about it is how someone left the interior as is when they brought this car in. There’s an old Mexican blanket on the seat, and other little articles reminiscent of a car that was well loved. When I look in the car windows, I get a nice, warm vibe, and I imagine the pleasant memories the owners of this car must have had.

My favourite thing about this car, is the little hula girl ornament on the dashboard.

I decided to shoot this from the outside in, with some outside reflections on the glass, and the focus on the hula girl in the centre of the dashboard. I shot this car from several angles, and I’m very happy with the way this photo turned out.

Bergger Pancro 400 120 film, pulled to EI 100. Home developed with HC-110 (1+31) 7:17 at 19.5°C. Shot with my Hasselblad 205fcc and Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. 1/500th at f/8.0.

Bergger Pancro 400 120 film, pulled to EI 100. Home developed with HC-110 (1+31) 7:17 at 19.5°C. Shot with my Hasselblad 205fcc and Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. 1/500th at f/8.0.

I’m currently shooting another roll of Bergger Pancro 400 film in my Hasselblad. This time I’ve pushed the film to EI 800 (exposure index). I think it will work well being pushed, and should have slightly greater contrast than it exhibits when shot at box speed. I’m excited to see the results.

Here are some older photos of that same car, but shot with Kodak Tri-X 400.

Vivitar XV-1 SLR on Kodak Tri-X 400 35mm film, pushed to 1600. Home developed in Kodak HC-110. 7.07 minutes at 30°C. Epson V-850 Scan.

Vivitar XV-1 SLR on Kodak Tri-X 400 35mm film, pushed to 1600. Home developed in Kodak HC-110. 7.07 minutes at 30°C. Epson V-850 Scan.

Vivitar XV-1 SLR on Kodak Tri-X 400 35mm film, pushed to 1600. Home developed in Kodak HC-110. 7.07 minutes at 30°C. Epson V-850 Scan.

Vivitar XV-1 SLR on Kodak Tri-X 400 35mm film, pushed to 1600. Home developed in Kodak HC-110. 7.07 minutes at 30°C. Epson V-850 Scan.

Vivitar XV-1 SLR on Kodak Tri-X 400 35mm film, pushed to 1600. Home developed in Kodak HC-110. 7.07 minutes at 30°C. Epson V-850 Scan.

Vivitar XV-1 SLR on Kodak Tri-X 400 35mm film, pushed to 1600. Home developed in Kodak HC-110. 7.07 minutes at 30°C. Epson V-850 Scan.

Bergger Pancro 400 Film

A little while ago, I was in Kerrisdale Cameras stocking up on some film, when I noticed a brand that I hadn’t seen before—Berger Pancro 400 black and white film. I’m always keen to try new film, and so I bought a couple of rolls in the 120 format (also available in 135).

When I got home, I did some research about the Bergger company, and WOW! They are a very well established company, with a wide variety of photography products available, including film, film paper and even developing chemistry.

Bergger is the heiress of the much older film company Guillemot, the last French firm that specializes in making photosensitive surfaces.

Of course, one of the very first things I did was search for image examples of the film I had just purchased, and I was immediately blown away by the quality and uniqueness of this film! I’d have sworn I was looking at film with an emulsion base of platinum or gold. The examples I found were exquisite to say the least.

From their website:

BERGGER Pancro 400 is a two emulsion film, composed with silver bromide and silver iodide. They differ by the size of their grain. These properties allow a wide exposure latitude.  Cristals are precipitated by double-jet process, under the control of a computer. The two emulsions are panchromatic, and are stabilized by high tech systems.

BERGGER Pancro400 in 120 is coated on a 100 microns PET base and includes an anti curling layer. It is designed with an undercoated anti-halation layer which clarifies during processing, and a anti-curling layer.

I loaded my first roll of Bergger Pancro 400 120 film into Apollo, my lovely old Hasselblad 500c, and I shot some photos around The Shipyards District in North Vancouver. Because this was the first roll, I shot it at box speed, ISO 400, so I would get a true sense of the nature of this film.

I developed the first roll with Kodak HC-110 (1+31) 6:30 minutes at **24°C.

Lovely Joanne at the Shipyards pier with her Leica R5 SLR. Bergger Pancro 400 120 film. Hasselblad 500c. 1/500th f/8.0. Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. Developed with HC-110 (1+31) 6:30 24°C. Epson V-850 scan.

Lovely Joanne at the Shipyards pier with her Leica R5 SLR. Bergger Pancro 400 120 film. Hasselblad 500c. 1/500th f/8.0. Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. Developed with HC-110 (1+31) 6:30 24°C. Epson V-850 scan.

Notice the incredible midrange details, and the beautiful, fine grain. Bergger Pancro has an amazing dynamic range. With most film, a photo like this would have very strong contrast, because Joanne is standing in direct sunlight, yet there is so much lovely detail in the shadows. The highlights are not blown out at all. There is a perfect balance.

An artist painting a scene at the Shipyards pier in North Vancouver. Bergger Pancro 400 120 film. Hasselblad 500c. 1/500th f/8.0. Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. Developed with HC-110 (1+31) 6:30 24°C. Epson V-850 scan.

An artist painting a scene at the Shipyards pier in North Vancouver. Bergger Pancro 400 120 film. Hasselblad 500c. 1/500th f/8.0. Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. Developed with HC-110 (1+31) 6:30 24°C. Epson V-850 scan.

As you can see, even though this film reveals so much detail in the midrange, it does not lack good contrast at all. It’s rare to see a film that can render both so well.

A man in The Polygon Gallery, with outside scene reflecting on the glass. Bergger Pancro 400 120 film. Hasselblad 500c. 1/125th f/5.6. Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. Developed with HC-110 (1+31) 6:30 24°C. Epson V-850 scan.

A man in The Polygon Gallery, with outside scene reflecting on the glass. Bergger Pancro 400 120 film. Hasselblad 500c. 1/125th f/5.6. Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. Developed with HC-110 (1+31) 6:30 24°C. Epson V-850 scan.

So, after shooting the first roll and discovering just how wonderful this film is, I wanted to see how it handles being pulled a couple of stops. Pull processing a film simply means you are metering for a lower exposure index than the normal box speed ISO sensitivity of the film, and then adjusting your development time accordingly. So for example, if your film’s box speed is ISO 400, you can pull it 2 stops to EI (Exposure Index) 100 by adjusting your camera metering to the exposure settings as if you were shooting ISO 100 film. You are purposely overexposing your film, and then under-developing it. The main reason for pulling film is to decrease contrast, and to give you more details in the shadows. (Note that this is the opposite effect of pushing film.) This is especially useful on bright sunny days with harsh shadows.

So, I loaded my second roll of Bergger Pancro 400 film, into Legend, my Hasselblad 205fcc, and set it at ISO 100. I developed using HC-110 (1+31) 7:17 at 19.5°C. Here are the results:

Joanne with one of her Polaroid cameras at The Polygon Gallery in North Vancouver. Bergger Pancro 400 120, pulled to EI 100. HC-110 (1+31) 7:17 at 19.5°C. Hasselblad 205fcc. Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. 1/500th at f/8.0. Epson V-850 scan.

Joanne with one of her Polaroid cameras at The Polygon Gallery in North Vancouver. Bergger Pancro 400 120, pulled to EI 100. HC-110 (1+31) 7:17 at 19.5°C. Hasselblad 205fcc. Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. 1/500th at f/8.0. Epson V-850 scan.

The Bergger Pancro 400 performed wonderfully when pulled to EI 100. You can see in these photos of Joanne that there is a lot of fine detail in all of the shadows, and the highlights are not blown out, even though these photos were shot in direct sunlight.

Joanne with one of her Polaroid cameras at The Polygon Gallery in North Vancouver. Bergger Pancro 400 120, pulled to EI 100. HC-110 (1+31) 7:17 at 19.5°C. Hasselblad 205fcc. Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. 1/500th at f/8.0. Epson V-850 scan.

Joanne with one of her Polaroid cameras at The Polygon Gallery in North Vancouver. Bergger Pancro 400 120, pulled to EI 100. HC-110 (1+31) 7:17 at 19.5°C. Hasselblad 205fcc. Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8. 1/500th at f/8.0. Epson V-850 scan.

In conclusion, it’s very clear that Bergger Pancro 400 is an exceptional film, with excellent dynamic range, and it yields beautiful images with fine, pleasing grain. I will certainly be shooting more of this film, and I highly recommend it. I may try some push processing on the next roll.

**My development temperatures sometimes vary from the standard 20°C, in which I adjust my development time accordingly. I may increase the developer temperature occasionally to speed up the development time, especially with push processing, as the development time can be very long. In some cases my developing temperature is less than the standard, simply to align with the actual room temperature. There are a lot of variables to maintain and control while developing film. I do not recommend this unless you are well experienced with the developing processes.

The Hasselblad

I’ve wanted a Hasselblad for as long as I can remember. I’ve shot photos with so many different kinds of cameras, but there’s nothing quite like the Hasselblad—It’s a classic, with an incredible history, and reputation. For medium format photography, it simply can’t be beat, especially with those Carl Zeiss lenses.

Well, as luck would have it, back in November, I came across a local ad online for a Hasselblad 500c. The price was very reasonable, and so I went for it. I made arrangements to meet up with the fellow who was selling it, just outside of the Commercial Skytrain station. I’d paid him in advance, something I don’t normally do, but I needed to secure this camera before someone else got their hands on it. It was the right thing to do, because from the moment he placed the ad, at least eight people showed interest.

So I met him in his van, just off Commercial Ave in Vancouver, and he gave me the camera. He also threw in a nice roll of expired Fujichrome Provia 100F Professional RDP-III 120 film, which was the first roll of film I loaded into the Hasselblad.

It has taken some practice getting used to using the Hasselblad 500c, but I absolutely love it. If you want to use a Hasselblad for street photography, you need to work extra hard. Finding your subject, and then focusing just in time, is no simple task, but it’s very rewarding when it’s done right. This particular model, the 500c, has a waist-level finder, which I think is perfect for street photography. It allows you to remain virtually unnoticed while you focus on your subject, because your camera is at your waist—unassuming, and nonthreatening, from your subject’s perspective. It is, of course, a lot easier using an eye level finder (optional for all Hasselblads, including mine) but again, getting a sneaky candid shot can be more difficult when you’re holding a very large camera up to your face.

Hasselblad 500c with Zeiss Planar 80mm f/2.8 lens, at f/11 1/500. Kodak Tri-X 400 film, pushed to 1600. Home developed in Joanne’s Kitchen Sink.

Hasselblad 500c with Zeiss Planar 80mm f/2.8 lens, at f/11 1/500. Kodak Tri-X 400 film, pushed to 1600. Home developed in Joanne’s Kitchen Sink.

As soon as I got my beautiful new Hasselblad home, I couldn’t wait to show it off to my Honey Bunny Joanne. We give most of our cameras their own special names, and for this Hasselblad, Joanne came up with the name Apollo. A perfect choice for this camera, because this was the model used by the NASA Apollo 8 Lunar mission where they shot those incredible photos from the moon!

I shot some portraits of Joanne, too. She’s not only a great artist and photographer, she’s also a lovely model!

Joanne, beside the Polygon Gallery in North Vancouver. Shot with my Hasselblad 500C (Apollo), on Rollei RPX 400 black and white film, pushed to EI 1600. Developed in Joanne’s kitchen sink.

Joanne, beside the Polygon Gallery in North Vancouver. Shot with my Hasselblad 500C (Apollo), on Rollei RPX 400 black and white film, pushed to EI 1600. Developed in Joanne’s kitchen sink.

Joanne on Lonsdale, in North Vancouver. Shot with my Hasselblad 500C (Apollo), on Rollei RPX 400 black and white film, pushed to EI 1600. Developed in Joanne’s kitchen sink.

Joanne on Lonsdale, in North Vancouver. Shot with my Hasselblad 500C (Apollo), on Rollei RPX 400 black and white film, pushed to EI 1600. Developed in Joanne’s kitchen sink.

Lovely Joanne. Shot with my Hasselblad 500c with Foma Holga 400 Black and White Negative Film. Pushed to EI 1600. Developed in Joanne's kitchen sink.

Lovely Joanne. Shot with my Hasselblad 500c with Foma Holga 400 Black and White Negative Film. Pushed to EI 1600. Developed in Joanne's kitchen sink.

I’m looking forward to shooting some upcoming events with Apollo. Stay tuned!